GAPID: A Proposal For The Global African Peoples

A CONTEXT
Currently the global African people are not united and lack a common symbol that would help to create a sense of collective unity. By global African peoples I mean Africans in Africa, the diaspora, and Africans who left via the slave trade and are now citizens of independent countries. Collective identity and meaning are important prerequisites for unity and cooperation for the global African peoples, and cultural or national symbols are powerful aids to fostering this sense of unity!

ISSUE:
Currently the global African peoples celebrate different independence days, based on when their different countries obtained independence. The global African peoples do not keep up with the plethora of dates, and many end up celebrating only their individual country’s independence or at most a few other countries. This leads to a fracturing among the global African people’s, who often do not really internalize the independence celebrations of another African country/people or relate it to their own heritage and history.

THE QUESTION:
What is one creative way that independence day celebrations can be strategically harnessed to foster a greater sense of collective unity among the global African peoples?

A SOLUTION (one of many)
I propose GAPID: “Global African People’s Independence Day.” A commemorative day when the global African people’s across all African countries, the Caribbean, and the America’s celebrate a day of collective independence. A day when all historical sons and daughters of Mother Africa unite as one people, raise different flags only as part of a broader mosaic of the global African peoples, celebrate commonalities, shared experiences, but also our unique evolutions and transformed identities that are beautiful feathers of the same bird. A day when we stand as one people, looking to the past, present, and future!


WORD OF CAUTION
The proposal would need to be carefully enacted with other proposals, so we avoid the danger of making the contemporary history of the global African peoples associated with slavery and colonization the primary marker of their collective identity! For the African peoples have a rich history of cultures and kingdoms whose elements would need to be factored to broaden the scope of the proposal.

CLOSING
The Osagyefo Kwame Nkrumah forwarded “Africa must unite!” Here, the proposal of GAPID – Global African People’s Independence Day seeks to advance that vision! Thus, I also call for the formation of GAPCON: Global African People’s Council of Nations, and the creation of a corresponding flag!

We must no longer stand aside and passively hope for a brighter African future, but with gaze focused upward and daring vision we must boldly spin the wheels of development forward! While diligently using our God-given abilities to energetically forge the African destiny into reality!

One Africa, One People… Focused Upward, Forever Onward!

~Dr. Ikenna Ezealah

Garvey-Nkrumah Delegation Meets The President of Ghana

During our visit to Ghana, the Garvey-Nkrumah Global Legal Fellows—led by Professor Woods of Howard University Law—visited the Jubilee House, the presidential palace in Accra that serves as a residence and office to the President of Ghana.

The Garvey-Nkrumah team of diaspora legal professionals representing institutions from Africa the USA, and Caribbean, then convened with President H.E Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo, and Mr. Akwasi Awua Ababio—the Directorate of the Diaspora Affairs Office of the President. This meeting centered on Ghana’s diaspora engagement efforts, including the Diaspora Engagement Policy—a flagship initiative launched on December 13th, 2023, which serves to coordinate the activities of various institutions to engage Ghanaians abroad effectively. The Diaspora Affairs Office emphasized the importance of involving the diaspora in national development and leveraging their resources for mutual benefit.

Enclosed are pictures of our visit to Jubilee House with the President of Ghana, which can be viewed on the official Instagram of The Office of the President of Ghana, Diaspora Affairs at the following link.

What a great opportunity and privilege to meet the President of Ghana, the Director of Diaspora Affairs and other governments officials, listen to dialogue on policy initiatives with global implications, then have engaging side chats and make connections! The experience was incredible… I look forward to more!

Onward & Upward!

~Dr. Ikenna Ezealah

African Governments, Be Geopolitically Agnostic And Focus on Economic Development!

A CONTEXT
To develop their countries, African governments must become geopolitically agnostic between East and West, and refrain from being entangled in the historic or current ideological positions of either side. Instead, they must focus exclusively on achieving rapid economic development by taking advantage of the increased market and investment opportunities. More multinational firms with similar skillsets means everyone can be substituted. This gives African governments leverage during negotiations if they can use it.

I will give an example how this can be achieved in the awarding of government contracts to multinational companies!

THE ISSUE
When African governments sign contracts with multinational companies for resource/mineral extraction, a seldom discussed problem is the underreporting of minerals excavated, altered business figures and price points, lack of transparency, and even third-party smuggling. The result is enormous losses of needed revenue year-to-year. To be fair, officials are frequently complicit.

THE QUESTION
How can African governments start creatively addressing these issues of underreported extracted resources/minerals and altered figures by multinational companies? Here are only the broad outlines of an idea.

A SOLUTION
Contracts for mineral/resource extraction should have two companies, preferably from geopolitical rival countries. One does the mining (e.g. Chinese), and the other is paid to directly monitor and audit the mineral quantities and monies/books (e.g. US). Next, as both foreign companies would establish a domestic subsidiary, the contract would require two groups of skilled diasporan professionals from the private sector of the host African country to own a percentage of both companies, and directly work in their management in the performance of the contract. 

The activities of both companies on the contract (owing to the geopolitical rivalry) would produce a checks and balances of information. Also, the placement of skilled diasporan professionals in the ownership and management of both companies ensures a transfer of knowledge, and access to insider information of both activities (mining and auditing).

REFLECTIONS
African governments must be strategic and use the geopolitical climate between West and East to facilitate their own national development agendas. Yet they should be fair, transparent, and trustworthy in the performance of all contracts to ensure there is collective benefit to all parties! Remember, both East and West need African resources and minerals, and initially during independence many African countries lacked and needed their technical expertise. But today many African countries have the technical expertise… only it is slumbering in their scattered diaspora and just requires vision, strategic organization and coordination to be tactically harnessed for investment initiatives to achieve rapid economic growth!

~Dr. Ikenna Ezealah

How African Resources Funds Global GDP Disparity… & Suggestions On First Steps To Change it

I wish to address, via a case study, how African resources fundS the global GDP disparity between continents. Then I will share some suggestions (of many others) that African governments can consider to begin strategically addressing this disparity.

INCOME DISPARITY (Estimated 2023 GDPs)
1) Asia: $42.7 trillion USD
2) North America: $30.4 trillion USD
3) Europe: $25.2 trillion USD
4) South America: $4.1 trillion USD
5) Middle East: $4 trillion USD
6) Africa: $3.1 trillion USD

THE ISSUE
It is estimated that Africa only benefits 2-8% of the value of raw materials from Africa, with most of the economic benefits being realized in countries where the processing and final product manufacturing take place.

COCOA INDUSTRY EXAMPLE
The global cocoa market value is about $130 billion, and Africa (Ivory Coast & Ghana) produces about 70% of the world’s cocoa beans yet it retains only about $5 billion USD from this market (3.84%). The price of raw cocoa beans exported from Africa is about $2,400 per ton, while a ton of chocolate processed from cocoa can sell for an estimated $25,000 to $30,000 USD. Consider this with EVERY mineral and resource Africa exports that gives rise to the global income disparity above!

THE QUESTION
How can African governments start transitioning to local production to capture a greater value of the market for all its minerals and resources?

A SOLUTION (of many)
African governments should no longer issue licenses or sign contracts for only mineral/resource extraction and exportation, but should condition the issuance of licenses with building manufacturing/industrial plants for their conversion into finished products on African soil. The 80-20 rule: 80% of raw materials must be processed locally, and only 20% are eligible for exports (and even then it should be intra-African). An audit of all prior mineral/resource licenses issued should be conducted, and a fair timeline should be given for their transition to domestic production. If the license holders do not meet the timeline, their license should be terminated.

For balance, the African government must provide significant investment perks and incentives and ease the process of investment and development for multinational firms. For example, governments can form SEZ (Special Economic Zones) and EPZ (Export Processing Zones) to allow freer economic activity, and can also subsidize infrastructure linking these zones with certain market centers and ports.

REFLECTIONS
African governments must be strategic and comprehensive in the measures they take to initiate economic growth. African leaders and governments must level up, and visionaries must vigorously drive nation-building to create a supportive framework that will enable the release of the African people’s creative potential into vibrant industry, innovation, and productivity. Then the open wound, bleeding significant income disparity, will eventually close to the prosperity of the African people.

~Dr. Ikenna Ezealah

Sources:

  • IMF World Economic Outlook Database (IMF)
  • International Cocoa Organization (ICCO)
  • Oxfam Report on Cocoa and Chocolate Industry (Oxfam)
  • World Bank – Commodity Prices (WB)

Africa Unchained: The Blueprint for Africa’s Future

I recently finished my Summer reading: “Africa Unchained, The Blueprint for Africa’s Future” by George B.N. Ayittey.

Mr. George Ayittey (late) was a Ghanaian economist, author, president of the Free Africa Foundation in Washington, D.C., a professor at American University, and an associate scholar at the Foreign Policy Research Institute.

For anyone interested in African economic development and nation-building… I highly recommend this book. His straight talk…no nonsense….hard hitting…satirical style is engaging. Ayittey’s comprehensive power of analysis and stratification that situates economics within the comparative context of African contemporary governance and historical cultural practices is incredible.

Mr. George B. N. Ayittey gives a play by play analysis of many African government policies post independence, the interaction with the international community, the role of African traditions in recommended policies, mistakes and successes, African leadership critique, specific ways to address misgovernance, and much more. Naturally when we read we should accept only what resonates within after careful weighing and examination.

His recommendations for African development are practical, and can be applied by those inclined to nation-building. Naturally we should accept only what resonates within after careful examination. The book has received citizenship to one’s personal library. It should be required reading in African schools and among the African diaspora, also in Western countries.

Through this book, my thoughts and approach to African nation-building and governance policies have been enhanced. A thousand thanks to Mr. George Ayittey for the tremendous effort and thought exerted to write this magnus opus. Your insightful thoughts will be part of the foundation for building a brighter African future.

Onward & Upward!

~Dr. Ikenna Ezealah

Africa And The World – GDP

In 2023, Japan’s GDP was $4.23 trillion

In 2023, Africa’s GDP was $3.1 trillion

Africa is 80 times Japan’s size, but the entire Africa is only 73% of Japan’s GDP.

Africa and Japan size comparison

Give that a moment to sink in and do its work.

If you were to take it a step further and compare the GDP of Africa as a continent with Europe, Asia, and even North America, then the colossal disparity might make your mind ache and bones rattle.

In the 2023 Top 20 GDPs, no African country was in the Top 20. However, if you added the African continent as one unit, it would be tied with France at #7. So when the Osagyefo Dr. Kwame Nkrumah said “Africa must unite”, this is not about idealistic notions of cultural oneness, kumbaya, or hakuna matata, but it is a clear recognition of the unavoidable need for economic survival and global competitiveness that comes through continental unity.

Now you see why some earnest Africans who see the big picture are not impressed by most African governments, who often implement an array of small one-off initiatives that, besides being largely ineffective, often lack any coherence with a broader agenda and vision.

Now you see why there is a clarion call for an urgent change in African leadership to chart a new direction in the continent today. For an ambitious drive for African nation-building with a bold vision, comprehensive strategies, tactical plans in all sectors meticulously coordinated and vigorously executed that continuously expands the economies. Daring leaders with big picture plans and long-term policies whose effects are precisely calculated to stretch at least 100years into the future.

Yes there are influences domestic and abroad that resist this. But this is no longer an excuse, for every continent faces resistance both within and without. Resistance is the cost of progress.

Africa is too blessed as a continent and people to tolerate mediocrity any longer, for bold advancement must be the standard. Looking upward, Africans must initiate the earnest striving for the highest possible goal that brings value and buoyant progress to the African collective.

Africans must energetically engage the political process and no longer shy away! Allowing ourselves to be instruments of the change we desire.

We cannot allow the potential of Africa to be wasted without genuine effort for positive change for the welfare of the people, which will also benefit other continents. We must work together to realize the great African potential, and thus be agents of positive change and ambitious growth!

Focused Upward, Forever Onward!

~Dr. Ikenna Ezealah

The Politican, Leader, Visionary

A politican thinks of the next election

A leader … the next generation

A visionary … the next century

To African people, which of these three mostly occupy office in Africa today? And who are thus empowered in influential positions, making decisions that will affect current and future generations of Africans?

Once this realization sinks in, we recognize that political complacency and apathy is not an option, and is only a license for continual economic captivity and retrogression.

All African governments and leaders must work for the welfare and benefit of the people… for the current, next, and future generations. Otherwise it loses legitimacy and must be changed and replaced. But the African people must first recognize and firmly demand this. From themselves and their leaders.

Focused upward… forever onward!

~Dr. Ikenna Ezealah

The Drunken Driver And The African Passengers

Imagine a vehicle driven by an inebriated driver, and the passengers are various sober professionals. The vehicle is zigzagging, so the concerned passengers start talking to the drunk driver and giving him elaborate explanations. But to no avail, the car keeps zigzagging, and a crash seems eminent. In response, they increase their explanations, but the inebriated driver fails to take heed because he is under the influence.  

The passengers are too engrossed in their elaborate speeches to simply recognize that because the driver is drunk, he cannot apprehend their words and will continue driving dangerously. So, the solution is clear: the passengers need to talk less, take possession of the steering wheel, and switch drivers. Only then will they avoid a crash and be safe.

The passengers in relation to the drunk driver are Africans in relation to their leaders today. The car represents the country, the wheel is government, seizing the steering wheel is entering into public service and exercising firm influence, and swapping drivers is energetically engaging in the political process to replace the current group of leaders. The drunkenness of the driver (poor leadership) represents the myopic influence of corrupt selfish interests, visionless maladministration, and strategic incapacity. The zigzagging depicts the hazardous swaying of many African economies heading toward a crash.

Africans today have convinced themselves that the skilled, gifted, and good-willing people in their societies should avoid politics and public service. Instead, they prefer being exclusive private sector passengers who leave the driving controls to inebriated drivers, who then run the risk of crashing the car and destroying the lives of everyone in it.

Africans today are doing too much talking and not enough political action to enter governance. Memorandums of Understanding, Policy dialogues, Conferences, Meetings, global forums, investment retreats and so much else. A bunch of talking, big visions and grand plans… while the real conditions on ground keep deteriorating. There is value in these initiatives and there has been incremental progress in Africa that people can be proud. But it has not been near the real potential of Africa because proper leadership in the public sector is an indispensable element for the private sector to reach its potential! These are facts.

The long-term success of all these initiatives will be severely limited unless energy is applied to take possession of the steering wheel of governance! That is, energetically organize into political action groups and vigorously engage in the process to enter office and elect new visionary and “sober” leaders who are prepared to truly serve!

The car is zigzagging, a crash is coming … unless Africans change their mentality and change the drivers, so the vehicle can then progress along the marked lines of the African destiny!

Onward & Upward!

~Dr. Ikenna Ezealah

Addressing The Recent Change In Nigeria’s National Anthem

Recently, the Nigerian President led a campaign and signed into law a change in the national anthem. The previous national anthem “Arise, O Compatriots”, created by five Nigerians and then was put to music by Benedict P. Odiase, is now replaced by “Nigeria, We Hail Thee”, which was written in 1960 by British expatriate Lillian Jean Williams and was initially adopted as Nigeria’s national anthem when the country gained independence on October 1, 1960.

“It is my priority” the President said, as citizens were given no input or involvement in the process. A minor issue was prioritized, despite major issues and urgent national priorities troubling the lives of the Nigerian citizens such as inflation, skyrocketing cost of food, inconsistent power, insecurity, dilapidating infrastructure, underfunding of education, departure of multinational firms, the downward spiraling economy, and much more. This move, reflecting misplaced priorities, poor timing, and a myopic insensitivity to the historical backdrop of the British colonial legacy by reimposing an anthem on Nigerians that a foreigner created and not the Nigerian people, is tragic evidence of lack of leadership and vision. An anthem is too personal for a people to be outsourced.

The words of “Nigeria, We Hail Three” were touted as being more inspirational and befitting. But no matter how inspirational the words of any chosen anthem are, the real question is: do the actions of the Nigerian political class as representatives of the citizenry reflect it? No! Can you find traces of respectable value system in most from the political class that gives meaning to the words of the national anthem? No! In the now former anthem, the first word is “Arise”, which is to awaken to higher vision, values, and sense of duty. To transcend ethnicity and petty politics, in order to listen to the call of service that, through diligent implementation, furthers the welfare of the whole. How many citizens and political leaders in Nigeria’s history up to the present can say they have even fulfilled this first word? Words change conditions only when practice empowers them to manifestation. The new anthem will not change the behavior of the political class, so instead of changing anthems the right move would have been to look within and change. If this proved too difficult, then it is the poor leadership and the political class that should have been changed, not the anthem.   

Moving beyond constructive criticism and notwithstanding the atrocious timing of the change in national anthem, I will now offer a solution and explain how a change in the national anthem can be approached that would encourage greater inclusive and a sense of collective ownership. Here are the ten recommended steps to properly changing the national anthem:

  1. Host an open townhall with members of the public from all levels of society, government officials, organizations and civil society.
  2. Make a live case to the people. Describe the origin, meaning, parties, timeline, and development of the anthems within the historical context of the country’s history, then share reasons why a change is necessary.
  3. Invite comments, questions, healthy debate, and exchange of diverse ideas so people are included in the purpose and process.
  4. Announce a “National Anthem Rewrite” initiative in which the Nigerian citizens are encouraged to create and submit a national anthem, and a recitation video to a national commission and on social media. The objective is to empower the Nigerian people to take ownership, unleash their creativity, and ensure the recited words of national pride arise from their spirit!
  5. All created anthems will be reviewed, finalists will be selected, then one chosen; or different elements of some can be combined to create one whole anthem. A citizen’s commission will adjoin the national commission to participate in the decision-making process.
  6. The bill introducing a change to the national anthem will then be presented to the National Assembly, where it should be passed after some discussions.
  7. A signing ceremony will be organized with members of the public from all levels of society, government officials, organizations, and civil society.
  8. A band/group comprising different tribes and regions of the country will be composed to sing, record, and perform the national anthem.
  9. The author(s) of the anthem, the public, and others will be invited to Abuja for the first live performance of the group in a day of national unity. The event will also feature performances by Nigerian artists, poets, and comments by civic and academic leaders. The author(s) in a ceremony will be given an award(s) by the President in recognition of their creative contribution to the country. Then, the multiethnic group garbed in their native attires will sing it live for the first time. Their voices, united with the audience, will reverberate proudly through the Nigerian ether!
  10. The lyrics will be engraved in a large plaque and decoratively mounted tall in a wall in the Statehouse Aso Rock Presidential Villa and the National Assembly Complex.

This way, the Nigerian people are involved, centered, and use their own abilities to define the meaning of their anthem instead of a foreigner. It is indolence, lack of vision, and want of creativity that makes African leaders always ready to adopt foreign ideas, systems, and institutions, without the indigenous impetus to harness the abilities of their people, build on their cultural heritage, and create something original.

Here, many will remonstrate, saying “Nigeria was not named by Nigerians, must we change that too?” If we are serious, yes! How did Nigeria get its name? According to Richard Bourne in his book:

“The name ‘Nigeria’ had been coined by his [Frederick Lugard’s] wife and admirer, Flora Shaw, colonial editor of The Times, in a letter she wrote to her paper in January 1897. She used it to define the territories abutting the River Niger that were then being traded in or claimed by the Royal Niger Company” (Nigeria: A New History of a Turbulent Century; p. 3).

Thus, Nigeria was named not with any historical symbolism, rich cultural meaning, or existential ideal for its future development, but based solely on a colonial convenience of grouping people together in relation to a landmark! And you my people conveniently accept that and even defend against any change because you have grown “accustomed” to it? How deep have we sunk in Africa! Now contrast this with the reason that Dr. Kwame Nkrumah gave in his autobiography about renaming the Gold Coast “Ghana”. He spoke about how in the very early days of the Christian era before England was important, his African ancestors had attained a great empire:

“It is said that lawyers and scholars were much respected in that empire and that the inhabitants of Ghana wore garments of wool, cotton, silk and velvet. Thee was trade in copper, gold and textile fabrics, and jewels and weapons of gold and silver were carried.

“Thus we may take pride in the name of Ghana, not out of romanticism, but as an inspiration for the future. It is right and proper that we should know about our past. For just as the future moves from the present, so the present has emerged from the past. Nor need we be ashamed of our past. There was much in it of glory. What our ancestors achieved in the context of their contemporary society gives us confidence that we can create, out of that past, a glorious future, not in terms of war and military pomp, but in terms of social progress and peace.” (The Autobiography of Kwame Nkrumah; p. 195-96)

What a difference of day and night in the naming of “Ghana” and “Nigeria”! One rich in historical meaning and an inspiration for the future, while the other is just a geographic convenience lacking substance. Perhaps the difference is that Ghana has had the fortune of a visionary leader at the head of government, while Nigeria has not! Nigeria has even historically worked hard to ensure its most talented and industrious citizens are deprived of every opportunity of leading government, so that an avaricious cabal of tribalistic, vacuous, and visionless officials can continue plundering the national coffers while pushing the people in penury toward the abyss of infamy. How will a change in anthem effect a change in this rot? A gargoyle that changes its shirt is just a gargoyle in a beautiful shirt. Except here the shirt is now “foreign made”.

To effect change in Nigeria and Africa, our leaders need to become scholars of history in addition to an elevation in values and thinking, so our present actions build from the past. Follow me therefore on a quick diversion to explain the meaning of “Ghana”.

Ghana was a kingdom of the Soninke people, who are the northernmost people of the great Mande family that occupied a territory close to the Sahara desert. To properly situate Ghana in Ancient Africa, we should be clear of ethnic clusters in that the Soninke, Malinke and Bambara belong to a group referred to as Mandingoes or Mande-speaking (The History of West Africa; p. 15-18). This is important because when interpreting historical records, the same kingdom might have been referenced with slightly different names and meanings by the people, only because the descriptions might arise from different languages of ethnic groups in the same or different broader family. This notion applies to Ghana because historically there are two traditions (perhaps more) that mention a great Soninke kingdom of gold with the names Wagadu and Kaya-Magha, which preceded the Mali Empire and its preeminent leader Mansa Musa!

In one tradition, Wagadu was a prosperous kingdom blessed with vast quantities of gold with its capital at Kumbi, and its kings bore the title of Magha or Manga. The other tradition arose out of Ta’rīkhs (Arabic texts) from Timbuktu that mention the kingdom of Kaya-Magha as predecessor of Mali, one of these texts name the capital city Qunbi (like Kumbi), while the other calls it Ghana. Kaya-Magha in Soninke language means “king of gold”. However, in Malinke, Gãna or Kãna means war chief (The History of West Africa; p. 120). Ghana was called ‘the land of gold’ by some Arab geographers. Although people use the name Ghana interchangeably for both the kingdom and capital, al-Bakrī says in his text that ‘Ghana is the title of their kings’. The ‘ghana’ was the “king of gold” and powerful protector “war chief” who ruled the land of gold, with its thriving people, social order, beauty, systems, and advancements!

Do you see the depth of thought the Osagyefo Kwame Nkrumah gave to the choice of name? How the name and concept can awaken pride in the people? Not flippant and superficial, but deep and introspective. Do you see how he insisted and persisted to reclaim the sovereign right to rename his people according to their rich heritage, and as a signpost for continuous progress? So, why does the Ivory Coast, Nigeria and others still bear their names of colonial humiliation? As a country we gain independence, yet we lack the strength, insight, and self-respect to choose our own name with relevant meaning and create our own original systems. Complacent in the comfort that it has become “customary”, we avoid the discomfort of making changes and instead choose the indolent road of either keeping things the same, or to make a change we look abroad for what we can adopt from others!

Look at Nigeria: a British education and legal system complete with judges still wearing the ridiculous colonial wigs. We are black people in Africa, the British have left, and we still insist on wearing white wigs as a symbol of our “colonial legal tradition”, even though US white American descendants of Europeans, who have a greater claim to wig-wearing due to racial homogeneity no longer perpetuate that custom. Yet it is us as black people who thoughtlessly still insist on wigs. Absolutely incredible! If original thinking is too challenging then, being facetious, we can at least wear a black African wig that resembles African characteristics!

In governance Nigeria initially adopted the British parliamentary system, and then to make a change switched to the US governance system. Where are the original systems of Nigerians and Africans? What new institutions and structures? Are we just copycats who must rely on Europe and the US for everything? And with the emergence of China will we copy them too? Under poor leadership and an apathetic citizenry, instead of looking within to produce originally, to make a change we always look abroad to copy as a certified stamp of personal humiliation. We were given free will and a brain, thus the capacity to choose and think for ourselves… it is time to creatively exercise both! We are a great people, so it is time to give life and cultural expression to our vibrant abilities as a people rich in heritage and potential!

How can an African hold the seat of leadership, then simply continue the status quo and not earnestly strive to make a change, but content with an adopted name, anthem, systems and all. Never should you accept it, for your sovereign right and indigenous pride as an African leader should forbid it! Leaders of Africa, stand up and straighten your backs or give way for others who are willing to! It is high time to awaken to high deeds and work diligently… for the self-respect, welfare and indigenous progress of the people!

The issue stated here is beyond naming, but the earnest process of Africans using their own indigenous abilities and heritage to guide all progressive developments connected with themselves and their environment! It includes name, culture, systems, institutions, architecture, theories, and everything else. The people have the right and sacred duty to participate in the forming of all symbols, systems, and institutions of their country. Here, in addition to misplaced priorities, the Nigerian government woefully failed and deprived its people from cooperating by using their own abilities to creatively form a new anthem and thus design a national meaning from their own inner beings.

Wrong and shameful, poor leadership lacking in vision, this is the sentencing of the Laws of Nature and many Nigerians, for which my words are the iron gavel that pounds in judgment! Wake up…Arise O Compatriots!

~Dr. Ikenna Ezealah