Essays

How Can Non-Black People Celebrate Juneteeth?

I have observed recent discussions on this topic and seen the range of proposals people have suggested. I typically avoid these subjects because it can sound patronizing, but today I will make an exception and boldly address the fundamental fact for those who are earnest and sincere.

Juneteeth – June 19, 1865, also known as “Freedom Day”, commemorates the emancipation of enslaved African Americans after the Civil War. While I celebrate this milestone, I also see Juneteeth as a day of false freedom, gross deception, economic disenfranchisement, and systematic neglect by the US government.

In a capitalistic society economic freedom is the central freedom. The point of slavery was the mass exploitation and violence of one race by another, for the purpose of the mass accumulation of economic wealth. After the political, economic, and institutional deck with all its benefits had already been stacked against African Americans in favor of their white brethren, a “freedom” was given but without any strong economic policies to rectify the exploitation and reshuffle the deck to support the economic empowerment and autonomy of African Americans, so they could then leverage this might to influence the formation of the State in accordance with their interests. What a joke, but without the laughter.

Contrast this with the land allocation and benefits the government afforded to the white population through the Homestead Act of 1862. Also, with how the US government cared for white servicemen after WWII through the GI Bill (Servicemen’s Readjustment Act of 1944) that provided a range of benefits from education, home loans, unemployment benefits, business loans and much else. It is a known fact that discrimination prevented Black Americans them from accessing the full benefits enjoyed by their White counterparts.

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. on Federal Subsidies to White Land Owners

So you have no political will to provide economic support for your black population for Juneteeth to “readjust” after centuries of slavery and economic exploitation, but you find this will for land allocation and also decades later for white servicemen so they can economically “readjust” after war. Do you see how disingenuous and duplicitous this is?

In the US, the absolute and exclusive measure of seriousness is how much economic benefit and incentives you are willing to provide! Everything else is minor or smokes and mirrors!

So how can non-black people celebrate Juneteeth?

Reading books and all that has value, but I have a different suggestion. If you are serious, ask a fundamental question:

“How can I leverage my position, connections, resources, and/or time to create opportunities for the economic advancement and empowerment of African Americans?”

This question is all embracing. Thus, your actions should produce, lead to, or create conditions for tangible economic gain. If you do this, then you would have celebrated what lies at the heart of Juneteeth, and only then would you be a real ally of the African American community.

~Dr. Ikenna Ezealah

Addressing The Recent Change In Nigeria’s National Anthem

Recently, the Nigerian President led a campaign and signed into law a change in the national anthem. The previous national anthem “Arise, O Compatriots”, created by five Nigerians and then was put to music by Benedict P. Odiase, is now replaced by “Nigeria, We Hail Thee”, which was written in 1960 by British expatriate Lillian Jean Williams and was initially adopted as Nigeria’s national anthem when the country gained independence on October 1, 1960.

“It is my priority” the President said, as citizens were given no input or involvement in the process. A minor issue was prioritized, despite major issues and urgent national priorities troubling the lives of the Nigerian citizens such as inflation, skyrocketing cost of food, inconsistent power, insecurity, dilapidating infrastructure, underfunding of education, departure of multinational firms, the downward spiraling economy, and much more. This move, reflecting misplaced priorities, poor timing, and a myopic insensitivity to the historical backdrop of the British colonial legacy by reimposing an anthem on Nigerians that a foreigner created and not the Nigerian people, is tragic evidence of lack of leadership and vision. An anthem is too personal for a people to be outsourced.

The words of “Nigeria, We Hail Three” were touted as being more inspirational and befitting. But no matter how inspirational the words of any chosen anthem are, the real question is: do the actions of the Nigerian political class as representatives of the citizenry reflect it? No! Can you find traces of respectable value system in most from the political class that gives meaning to the words of the national anthem? No! In the now former anthem, the first word is “Arise”, which is to awaken to higher vision, values, and sense of duty. To transcend ethnicity and petty politics, in order to listen to the call of service that, through diligent implementation, furthers the welfare of the whole. How many citizens and political leaders in Nigeria’s history up to the present can say they have even fulfilled this first word? Words change conditions only when practice empowers them to manifestation. The new anthem will not change the behavior of the political class, so instead of changing anthems the right move would have been to look within and change. If this proved too difficult, then it is the poor leadership and the political class that should have been changed, not the anthem.   

Moving beyond constructive criticism and notwithstanding the atrocious timing of the change in national anthem, I will now offer a solution and explain how a change in the national anthem can be approached that would encourage greater inclusive and a sense of collective ownership. Here are the ten recommended steps to properly changing the national anthem:

  1. Host an open townhall with members of the public from all levels of society, government officials, organizations and civil society.
  2. Make a live case to the people. Describe the origin, meaning, parties, timeline, and development of the anthems within the historical context of the country’s history, then share reasons why a change is necessary.
  3. Invite comments, questions, healthy debate, and exchange of diverse ideas so people are included in the purpose and process.
  4. Announce a “National Anthem Rewrite” initiative in which the Nigerian citizens are encouraged to create and submit a national anthem, and a recitation video to a national commission and on social media. The objective is to empower the Nigerian people to take ownership, unleash their creativity, and ensure the recited words of national pride arise from their spirit!
  5. All created anthems will be reviewed, finalists will be selected, then one chosen; or different elements of some can be combined to create one whole anthem. A citizen’s commission will adjoin the national commission to participate in the decision-making process.
  6. The bill introducing a change to the national anthem will then be presented to the National Assembly, where it should be passed after some discussions.
  7. A signing ceremony will be organized with members of the public from all levels of society, government officials, organizations, and civil society.
  8. A band/group comprising different tribes and regions of the country will be composed to sing, record, and perform the national anthem.
  9. The author(s) of the anthem, the public, and others will be invited to Abuja for the first live performance of the group in a day of national unity. The event will also feature performances by Nigerian artists, poets, and comments by civic and academic leaders. The author(s) in a ceremony will be given an award(s) by the President in recognition of their creative contribution to the country. Then, the multiethnic group garbed in their native attires will sing it live for the first time. Their voices, united with the audience, will reverberate proudly through the Nigerian ether!
  10. The lyrics will be engraved in a large plaque and decoratively mounted tall in a wall in the Statehouse Aso Rock Presidential Villa and the National Assembly Complex.

This way, the Nigerian people are involved, centered, and use their own abilities to define the meaning of their anthem instead of a foreigner. It is indolence, lack of vision, and want of creativity that makes African leaders always ready to adopt foreign ideas, systems, and institutions, without the indigenous impetus to harness the abilities of their people, build on their cultural heritage, and create something original.

Here, many will remonstrate, saying “Nigeria was not named by Nigerians, must we change that too?” If we are serious, yes! How did Nigeria get its name? According to Richard Bourne in his book:

“The name ‘Nigeria’ had been coined by his [Frederick Lugard’s] wife and admirer, Flora Shaw, colonial editor of The Times, in a letter she wrote to her paper in January 1897. She used it to define the territories abutting the River Niger that were then being traded in or claimed by the Royal Niger Company” (Nigeria: A New History of a Turbulent Century; p. 3).

Thus, Nigeria was named not with any historical symbolism, rich cultural meaning, or existential ideal for its future development, but based solely on a colonial convenience of grouping people together in relation to a landmark! And you my people conveniently accept that and even defend against any change because you have grown “accustomed” to it? How deep have we sunk in Africa! Now contrast this with the reason that Dr. Kwame Nkrumah gave in his autobiography about renaming the Gold Coast “Ghana”. He spoke about how in the very early days of the Christian era before England was important, his African ancestors had attained a great empire:

“It is said that lawyers and scholars were much respected in that empire and that the inhabitants of Ghana wore garments of wool, cotton, silk and velvet. Thee was trade in copper, gold and textile fabrics, and jewels and weapons of gold and silver were carried.

“Thus we may take pride in the name of Ghana, not out of romanticism, but as an inspiration for the future. It is right and proper that we should know about our past. For just as the future moves from the present, so the present has emerged from the past. Nor need we be ashamed of our past. There was much in it of glory. What our ancestors achieved in the context of their contemporary society gives us confidence that we can create, out of that past, a glorious future, not in terms of war and military pomp, but in terms of social progress and peace.” (The Autobiography of Kwame Nkrumah; p. 195-96)

What a difference of day and night in the naming of “Ghana” and “Nigeria”! One rich in historical meaning and an inspiration for the future, while the other is just a geographic convenience lacking substance. Perhaps the difference is that Ghana has had the fortune of a visionary leader at the head of government, while Nigeria has not! Nigeria has even historically worked hard to ensure its most talented and industrious citizens are deprived of every opportunity of leading government, so that an avaricious cabal of tribalistic, vacuous, and visionless officials can continue plundering the national coffers while pushing the people in penury toward the abyss of infamy. How will a change in anthem effect a change in this rot? A gargoyle that changes its shirt is just a gargoyle in a beautiful shirt. Except here the shirt is now “foreign made”.

To effect change in Nigeria and Africa, our leaders need to become scholars of history in addition to an elevation in values and thinking, so our present actions build from the past. Follow me therefore on a quick diversion to explain the meaning of “Ghana”.

Ghana was a kingdom of the Soninke people, who are the northernmost people of the great Mande family that occupied a territory close to the Sahara desert. To properly situate Ghana in Ancient Africa, we should be clear of ethnic clusters in that the Soninke, Malinke and Bambara belong to a group referred to as Mandingoes or Mande-speaking (The History of West Africa; p. 15-18). This is important because when interpreting historical records, the same kingdom might have been referenced with slightly different names and meanings by the people, only because the descriptions might arise from different languages of ethnic groups in the same or different broader family. This notion applies to Ghana because historically there are two traditions (perhaps more) that mention a great Soninke kingdom of gold with the names Wagadu and Kaya-Magha, which preceded the Mali Empire and its preeminent leader Mansa Musa!

In one tradition, Wagadu was a prosperous kingdom blessed with vast quantities of gold with its capital at Kumbi, and its kings bore the title of Magha or Manga. The other tradition arose out of Ta’rīkhs (Arabic texts) from Timbuktu that mention the kingdom of Kaya-Magha as predecessor of Mali, one of these texts name the capital city Qunbi (like Kumbi), while the other calls it Ghana. Kaya-Magha in Soninke language means “king of gold”. However, in Malinke, Gãna or Kãna means war chief (The History of West Africa; p. 120). Ghana was called ‘the land of gold’ by some Arab geographers. Although people use the name Ghana interchangeably for both the kingdom and capital, al-Bakrī says in his text that ‘Ghana is the title of their kings’. The ‘ghana’ was the “king of gold” and powerful protector “war chief” who ruled the land of gold, with its thriving people, social order, beauty, systems, and advancements!

Do you see the depth of thought the Osagyefo Kwame Nkrumah gave to the choice of name? How the name and concept can awaken pride in the people? Not flippant and superficial, but deep and introspective. Do you see how he insisted and persisted to reclaim the sovereign right to rename his people according to their rich heritage, and as a signpost for continuous progress? So, why does the Ivory Coast, Nigeria and others still bear their names of colonial humiliation? As a country we gain independence, yet we lack the strength, insight, and self-respect to choose our own name with relevant meaning and create our own original systems. Complacent in the comfort that it has become “customary”, we avoid the discomfort of making changes and instead choose the indolent road of either keeping things the same, or to make a change we look abroad for what we can adopt from others!

Look at Nigeria: a British education and legal system complete with judges still wearing the ridiculous colonial wigs. We are black people in Africa, the British have left, and we still insist on wearing white wigs as a symbol of our “colonial legal tradition”, even though US white American descendants of Europeans, who have a greater claim to wig-wearing due to racial homogeneity no longer perpetuate that custom. Yet it is us as black people who thoughtlessly still insist on wigs. Absolutely incredible! If original thinking is too challenging then, being facetious, we can at least wear a black African wig that resembles African characteristics!

In governance Nigeria initially adopted the British parliamentary system, and then to make a change switched to the US governance system. Where are the original systems of Nigerians and Africans? What new institutions and structures? Are we just copycats who must rely on Europe and the US for everything? And with the emergence of China will we copy them too? Under poor leadership and an apathetic citizenry, instead of looking within to produce originally, to make a change we always look abroad to copy as a certified stamp of personal humiliation. We were given free will and a brain, thus the capacity to choose and think for ourselves… it is time to creatively exercise both! We are a great people, so it is time to give life and cultural expression to our vibrant abilities as a people rich in heritage and potential!

How can an African hold the seat of leadership, then simply continue the status quo and not earnestly strive to make a change, but content with an adopted name, anthem, systems and all. Never should you accept it, for your sovereign right and indigenous pride as an African leader should forbid it! Leaders of Africa, stand up and straighten your backs or give way for others who are willing to! It is high time to awaken to high deeds and work diligently… for the self-respect, welfare and indigenous progress of the people!

The issue stated here is beyond naming, but the earnest process of Africans using their own indigenous abilities and heritage to guide all progressive developments connected with themselves and their environment! It includes name, culture, systems, institutions, architecture, theories, and everything else. The people have the right and sacred duty to participate in the forming of all symbols, systems, and institutions of their country. Here, in addition to misplaced priorities, the Nigerian government woefully failed and deprived its people from cooperating by using their own abilities to creatively form a new anthem and thus design a national meaning from their own inner beings.

Wrong and shameful, poor leadership lacking in vision, this is the sentencing of the Laws of Nature and many Nigerians, for which my words are the iron gavel that pounds in judgment! Wake up…Arise O Compatriots!

~Dr. Ikenna Ezealah

Meeting Mr. Peter Obi, the former Presidential Candidate of Nigeria

On the same day President Ruto of Kenya visited the White House this week, I had the pleasure to meet Mr. Peter Obi, the recent Presidential Candidate of Nigeria. The event was part of his thank you tour for all who supported his candidacy during the recent elections.

Since I am interested and committed to nation-building and governance in the African continent, I appreciated hearing him speak. I paid close attention to his ultimate aim, his vision, his nature, his mentality and conceptual framework, his approach to governance, and how he navigated experiences he shared. I read between the lines, followed eyes movements, body language, emotions behind words… to get a good reading for my own education. I even asked a question during the Q & A session.

Before you start climbing, you must learn from those who are already near the summit.

I respect him for many reasons I can explain. But there are three things in particular I noticed that he does not do, which may appear small but are significant in character: 1) Blame others; 2) Complain; 3) Demean other politicians.

It was an insightful and refreshing experience. Mentally I took careful notes. There were inner and outer connections, inspirations, and a reinforcement for me to keep my eyes fixed on the cause and keep marching toward the goal of being an international nation-building diplomat, who will be a helper and guardian of the welfare and further development of the African people.

Onward & Upward!

~Dr. Ikenna Ezealah

AI Tools For African Development & News

I am reaching out to see if anyone knows of an AI African development/news synthesizer. An AI product that aggregates news, latest developments, historical facts, government actions, policy dialogues, investments, innovations, and geopolitical matters across all reportable sectors in every African country. Included in this should be thought-leaders in podcasts, academia, and civil society.

In one tool I want to reach and vigilantly monitor developments in the entire continent in an all-encompassing manner from the past to present, information consolidated and tightly coordinated, to see everything happening at the same time like an eagle looking at the whole continent from space.

If you know of any existing tools or any such tools in development, please share so I can experiment.

Based on the above description, it is important that African governments enact policies and take actions that rigorously monitor and authenticate the AI data inputs (sources AI is using for its information), but also the outputs (where the gathered information from people is being collected and what the AI company is doing with it). AI should not become a Trojan Horse in the African continent, so it is the task of leadership to ensure the inputs and outputs are under scrutiny through firm policy implementation and monitoring. The best case scenario is Africans building AI technologies that can compete with foreign ones, so they personally control the inputs and outputs.

From a business standpoint, AI companies will be a great investment. From a legal perspective, AI law and regulation will be in high demand and a lucrative career. From a human perspective, AI should support human value systems and be an efficient assistant for productive activities but not dictate or distort them. The AI tsunami has already started and will affect everything, so the focus at this point is how to properly harness it to serve good goals and positive activities that bring value to society.

So, if you know of any such tools mentioned above, please share.

~Dr. Ikenna Ezealah

Africa And Western Liberal Democracy

“We [African countries] made a mistake adopting western liberal democracy” 

…stated Former President Olusegun Obasanjo of Nigeria when he met members of the House of Representatives in Abuja on Monday who are championing the reintroduction of the parliamentary system of government. As reported by The Premium Times Nigeria. 

Obasanjo is stating what for years I have been emphatically saying to African people after deep reflection and comprehensive assessment of past, present, and future. Namely, that the western liberal democratic system is not suitable for the African people who have a different nature and cultural heritage. 

The liberal democratic system is good for the US, and the parliamentary system is good for Europe, but both systems and all other imported foreign systems are ineffective and inefficient for the African people. Even detrimental for progress. I will take it a step further:

“No African country can blossom to its potential by perpetuating the adopted parliamentary or liberal western democratic system!” 

This is an immutable fact of unchangeable objective reality. These systems are beneficial for western countries, but not for Africa. 

“We ruled ourselves before the advent of colonialism. We had empires and striving kingdoms.” Obasanjo said. Thus, there is a knowledge of different African frameworks that African people today have abandoned and need to recover and modernize!

What is the next step? 

My proposal is to call a Continental Constitutional Council (CCC), which will feature key representatives of various ethnic groups, regions, governments, and sectors in African society. Each group will bring knowledge of different governance systems and societal structures of different empires, kingdoms, and ethnic groups throughout African history. 

Next, they should meticulously study these indigenous systems and structures, combine them in new ways, assess present realities, and modernize them into different potential models. Next, they will return to their various countries equipped with this general body of knowledge and potential models, then the specific country or region will engage their citizens and different sectors of society in order to design a system that modifies and localizes the knowledge exchange of the CCC. 

The African people should not adopt or copy, but create a new governance system from their inner beings and by improving past systems. Thus, everything must become new! We must build and create what we need for ourselves. 

I applaud the preliminary effort of the Nigerian officials who are asking questions and exploring a new system. To the Nigerian government I will say: 

“I am fully prepared and committed to join this initiative of Constitutional redesign and governance restructuring for indigenous nation-building. So, if you call requesting my involvement… anytime, anywhere, you will find me energetically action-ready.”

To the African people, true progress for you lies in actively using the abilities of your souls to continuously build on the knowledge of your ancestors. 

Onward & Upward!

~Dr. Ikenna Ezealah

Africa Must Unite!

The saying “Africa must unite” is not just a philosophical ideology, but a practical necessity for survival and continental progress. I have earnestly reflected about the way forward for Africa from every possible angle, and have concluded:

“Without collective African unity, no African country in the present or immediate future can develop into a global power.”

Here is an illustration using Senegal. Imagine Apple and Google setup operations in Senegal, and Senegal enjoins them to strictly follow local laws to avoid legal consequences. Now consider the Senegalese GDP compared with the revenue of the multinational firms.

Senegal 2023 GDP: $64 billion

Apple 2023 Profit: $97 billion ($383 billion revenue)

Google 2023 Profit: $73.795 billion ($307 billion revenue)

Question: How can Senegal whose GDP is less than the profit of both firms realistically have the economic power to hold them accountable? How can Senegal alone withstand the financial onslaught and greater leverage of the stronger multinational firms if they flexed their might through various means?

To have effective enforcement power over multinational entities and stronger foreign countries, the continent needs to work together because the collective economic and political strength, when strategically coordinated, will be able to outweigh and overpower. It is as simple as that.

Imagine if Africa has a Continental Congress that forms overarching unifying policies so there are two sets of laws: domestic laws of the African country, and an overarching continental law that applies when specific criteria are met. Now imagine if one of these policies is summarized as follows:

“If a multinational firm operates in any African country and their annual revenue equals or exceeds the GDP of the African country, then the multinational firm will no longer be subject to the local laws of the said country but superseding continental regulation and oversight by the African Continental Congress.”

The cross-border oversight would ensure that monitoring, regulation, and enforcement would be continental in scope and effect through tightly coordinated political and economic power.  The same holds true in other sectors. So, if African countries obstinately insist on pursuing their individual courses and policies because they are enjoying the spoils of “sovereignty”, then they will be relentlessly picked apart and remain weaker.

But Africa’s unique geography, cultural heritage, history, resource endowment, and present circumstance in global geopolitics absolutely requires that, to properly develop and counter all adverse influences, all African countries be closely coordinated so they work as effective and efficient parts of a greater whole.

Africa’s strength lies in its unity, whereby smaller rivers join into a stronger ocean of collective might whose waves can then guide the march of events to a brighter African destiny.

“Africa must unite.” So the Osagyefo Kwame Nkrumah was right!

All for one and one for all. Onward & Upward!

~Dr. Ikenna Ezealah

Africa, It Is Time To Reclaim Your Naming Rights!

Africa, it is time to reassess the names of some territories, landmarks, and places you have continued from colonization, and which you have not corrected since gaining independence. It is time to reclaim your naming rights. I have some examples to initiate broader reflection:

Question 1: Do you know why the city “Port Harcourt” in Nigeria is called “Harcourt”? Richard Bourne says the following in his book about the former Colonial Governor-General of Nigeria Frederick Lugard, who oversaw the amalgamation of the Northern and Southern Protectorate to form “Nigeria” in 1914:

“Lugard finished his term in Hong Kong in March 1912 and, exploiting his status and contacts, successfully lobbied Lewis ‘Loulou’ Harcourt, Viscount Harcourt, Secretary of State for the Colonies in the Liberal government, to become Governor-General of Nigeria. In August 1913, as a gesture of thanks towards his patron, Lugard got his permission to name a newly built port on the Niger ‘Port Harcourt’” (p. 11).

1913 – 2024 = 111 years! Question: why in 111 years has the name of a landmark in Nigeria not been renamed after one of many prominent Africans of the native ethnic group in that region? Why are you so comfortable continuing this colonial legacy instead of reclaiming your naming rights? Where is the African leadership? How can you accept one of your cities named after a colonial head because of a backdoor political deal to rule your people?

Question 2: Between Zambia and Zimbabwe, the charming Zambezi River falls over a cliff and forms a beautiful and massive waterfall! The enchanting scene is such a marvel that it is named one of the wonders of the Nature world! However, Why is this natural wonder in Africa called “Victoria Falls”? According to Brittanica:

“The British explorer David Livingstone was the first European to see the falls (November 16, 1855). He named them for Queen Victoria of the United Kingdom.”

1855 – 2024= 169 years! Question: why in 169 years has the name of this gorgeous natural landmark not been renamed after an African Queen? Why are you comfortable continuing this colonial legacy that pushes your own history to the side? Also, are you not skeptical at the coincidence of the waterfall bearing a non-African name as it is labeled a natural wonder of the world?

Question 3: Why is Victoria Island in Nigeria called “Victoria”?

My Theory: The Royal Niger Company (1879-1900) received its charter from the British Government and operated in West Africa signing and enforcing unfair trade deals and taking territories. Their charter was eventually revoked and their assets transferred to the British Government who, on January 1, 1900, colonially took control of the area they would later amalgamate to Nigeria in 1914. During this time of the Royal Niger Company, Victoria was the queen of the UK (1837-1901). Therefore, I suspect “Victoria Island” in Nigeria was named after her.

Question: Why in over 100 years has the name not been changed to its original name, or renamed after a prominent figure in the ethnic group who for hundreds of years have historically populated the area? Where is the leadership in Africa?

The same pattern repeats itself in all African countries today. The relic of the colonial era that is shamefully continued. But it is time for change and the African people need to reclaim their naming rights and make a comprehensive change. Moving forward, every single landmark, natural wonder, city, town etc. on African soil that bears its legacy from colonization needs to be renamed with an African name. The African people had names for these territories and places, so it is time to revert to those names or give them a new one… but in the image of the African people! Stand up my people.

Onward & Upward!

~Dr. Ikenna Ezealah

Africa, What Is The Vision?

When I look at Africa today, the unsettled question that burns within me is: what is the vision? When I examine the various countries, their present and past officials, again the question resounds: what is the all-embracing vision for Africa?

There are many conferences, policy discussions, analysis, meetings, investment forums and the like. People gather to issue bold declarations and start different initiatives. And while all of this has value, today I still do not see or have heard a genuine vision for the continent that is established as the guiding light and fundamental principle around which all activities and African countries are meticulously organized and coordinated.

Africa, what is the vision?

People may point to the African Union 2063 Agenda. I have read it, but they are just words on a document whose effect has been lukewarm at best. I have yet to see an African official who embodies the spirit of that vision along with their own, who burns like an ocean of flames for indigenous African nation-building! That when they speak you feel the volcanic heat of enthusiasm that inspires bold and diligent action to reclaim the African destiny! The type of official that no longer has a vision but has become the vision!

Africa, what is the vision? And where are the visionaries?

This question troubles me because there is need for it. You see, there are two types of changes – changes within a system, and changes to a system. Most of these activities, initiatives and conferences are based on incremental changes within the system. But the type of vision I am referring is about changes to the system itself, that still embraces the smaller incremental changes.

Since African countries gained independence, it has been a continuation of the adopted colonial systems. A Continental Congress still needs to be called to revisit and initiate changes to these adopted institutions and systems, in order to redirect, redefine, and redesign the African destiny!

Africa, what is the vision? That is the call of this generation.

Onward & Upward!

~Dr. Ikenna Ezealah

Garvey-Nkrumah Fellowship Program

It is with great joy I announce that, this Summer, I will be a Legal Fellow and global cohort class member of the 2024 Garvey-Nkrumah Fellowship Program!

The Garvey-Nkrumah Fellowship Program, established in honor of international civil rights leaders, political theorists, and dignitaries Marcus Garvey and Kwame Nkrumah, is a summer leadership and professional development initiative designed to train aspiring lawyers and future leaders of African descent in the areas of International Trade & Development, Public Policy & Diplomacy, Conflict & Dispute Resolution, and Civil & Human Rights. Fellows will engage in a comprehensive learning experience through a legal internship, a trip to Ghana and Rwanda, and a self-directed capstone project designed to advance solutions that address legal, social, economic, and/or public policy issues within Africa, the Caribbean, and the Americas.

This Legal Fellowship is a big victory, for it strategically builds on my professional experiences from 2023: (1) International Trade Intern at the United Nations International Trade Center in Geneva, Switzerland; (2) International Diplomatic Immersion experience at the Washington International Diplomatic Academy; and (3) Multilateral Diplomacy training at the United Nations Immersion Program for Multilateral Diplomacy.

With unswerving precision it also furthers my professional goal:

To be an international nation-building diplomat who creates and implements policies that drives the indigenous development, progress, self-sufficiency, and economic integration of the African continent.

I resolved to go to law school to answer an inner call to support the emergence of genuine leadership in Africa, to partake in the work of institutional transformation in post-colonial Africa so it reflects the cultural heritage and indigenous nature of the people, and to create frameworks that encourages the creative expression of the natural abilities of the African people for the progress of the African continent.

Yet I knew my designs and efforts alone would be insufficient, for I needed the decisive Grace of God and His Blessing to guide my earnest efforts to reach the goal! Thus, I find success because I try to lean into the guidance of God to know where I am to energetically exert diligent efforts to achieve victory! I am thankful to the Almighty for His Grace that opens doors!

My formula is: The will + higher guidance + strategic diligence /(over) time = unconditional victory! Every element in the equation must be balanced for the victory to be unconditional

I am honored to be a Garvey-Nkrumah Fellow, in the names of two men whose lives are a signpost to my own destiny. Yet I know every success I am afforded is only a Divine loan I am to repay through the service of my life to help my people. Thus, what drives me is not personal success, but to achieve my life’s objective:

To be a servant of God on earth, and a helper and guardian of the welfare and further development of the African people!

Onward & Upward!

~Dr. Ikenna Ezealah

The Flawed Framework Of The US-Africa Summit

The US-Africa Leaders Summit was an initiative in which President Biden invited leaders from across the African continent to Washington DC on December 13-15, 2022. For the US the Summit aimed to strengthen ties with African partners and collaborate on key areas of mutual interests.

I respect the general purpose of the Summit and applaud the US effort in organizing it. However, I believe the framework of the Summit was severely flawed and even in poor taste, but that the African leaders were willing accomplices in this poor design.

A Summit between 1 country and 1 continent (54 countries) is organized, and it is continent that comes to the country instead of the 1 country coming to the continent! A framework reflects a worldview, and here the worldview reflects the attitude that Western interests is primary in any dynamic. As the all-important center around which all others must gather around and find their place, despite the use of words like “partners”. The optics reflected the notion that the US and the President does not believe making serious efforts to be worthwhile when dealing with Africa, and they will only engage when it is convenient. Thus, going to Africa is not worth the effort unless the whole of Africa comes to the US.

But the African leaders also erred. The framework of their thinking still reflects a valorization of the West and the US, not as partners but as models to emulate and the center around which they should organize themselves. In the attitude of African elites is a subconscious tendency to prioritize and compliantly follow the initiative of theirs without original modification. Thus, when invited abroad, they eagerly fly to DC and take pictures with the giddiness of star-struck tourists.

That is what the framework of the US-Africa Summit communicated to many keen observers who paid attention.

If there was a real leader in Africa, then upon receiving the invitation he would graciously thank the US and take the invitation under advisement. Next, he would consult with other African leaders and kindly respond with a modification: saying that the leaders of Africa propose the Summit be held in Africa, in a country to be chosen by a designated date, and that African leaders will give the US delegation a befitting reception on African soil.

But who in Africa responded this way? Where was the leadership that continentally organized and coordinated other African leaders to ensure that even framework of the US-Africa Summit was respectfully balanced?

For the next US-Africa Summit, I recommend the US President visit Africa and engage with the African officials there. The framework would then show that the US wishes to take the trouble to engage Africa like respectful partners, and is willing to make the effort to forge new deals at the cost of some convenience.

Again, I applaud the aim of the US-Africa Summit, but the framework among other elements was flawed and needs to change to produce a better outcome.

~Dr. Ikenna Ezealah